Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 241 - 260
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 12:18 pm
No. 10/784,066; Tech. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
No. 10/784,066; Tech. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
In an opinion filed on November 14, and later certified for publication on December 13, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) affirmed a Sonoma County Superior Court judgment upholding the EIR for a 180-unit apartment complex proposed on a 15.45-acre parcel of vacant land along the Petaluma River. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
In compliance with that order, the protocol has been filed with the court under seal. 3 minor changes. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
Slip op. at 10. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
Once again, a meta-analysis is advanced as a basis for an expert witness’s causation opinion, and once again, the opinion is the subject of a Rule 702 challenge. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:55 am
3. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
May 10, 2013), which decided a number of very interesting issues (including preemption) in the context of motions in limine filed in an Aredia/Zometa case. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:45 pm
I would estimate that only about 1 in 3 of those folks who begin this program become debt free. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
App. 2006), as modified (July 10, 2006). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:00 am
This refers to an analysis prepared by, or under the direction of, a Federal agency to determine whether a proposed action is likely to: (1) adversely affect listed species or designated critical habitat; (2) jeopardize the continued existence of species that are proposed for listing; or (3) adversely modify proposed critical habitat. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Myer, No. 10-0734 (Tex. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:59 am
” Members Miscimarra and Johnson filed separate opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part (Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc., December 15, 2014). [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
The renewal policy differed from the initial policy in four ways: (1) an updated price; (2) 1 year of coverage instead of 10; (3) $5 million coverage limit instead of $14 million; and (4) exclusion of the Elizabethtown site. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:18 am
§ 10, Tex. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:18 am
§ 10, Tex. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Hensley, 461 U.S. at 430 n.3. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:26 am
AG Szpunar has delivered his long-awaited opinion on the topic in the CJEU Tom Kabinet case on 10 September [Katpost here]. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:06 pm
Charge filed by the Steelworkers; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
