Search for: "People v. Bush"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
The two principal “institutional” powers people typically cite are, first, Congress’s inherent contempt authority—which, a century ago, it used occasionally to imprison recalcitrant witnesses—and, second, Congress’s authority to appropriate money. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in FDA v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
But as SCOTUS held in Burwell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 9:33 pm
Holder in 2013 — or really Bush v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:56 am
" See also L.T. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 6:31 am
“The court’s decision in the 2000 presidential election case, Bush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Jackson said in his famous concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, the NDAA provision lay dormant through the Bush and Obama administrations, until it was finally picked up in September 2019 by Sens. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, I signed onto an amicus brief urging the New York Court of Appeals to grant review in the case of NHRP v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
The three Degraffenreid dissenters suggest that stray dicta from an 1892 case that in no way involved the limits that a state constitution might place on a state legislature in this arena—and casual quotation from this case in a part of the discredited Bush v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:20 am
” Before Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The reversal in course in California v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Bush’s signature initiatives, and his version of the gag rule specifically exempted HIV/AIDS funding because it was understood organizations providing prevention, care, or treatment to people with HIV/AIDS could not adequately function under the gag rule’s restrictions. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
PfanderChapter 11 Bush v. [read post]
