Search for: "Save Benefits Inc. v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
A holding that the three corporations at issue here--Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Mardel, Inc., and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am
It's snowy and cold today in the Eastern United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Save for the wording, the old defence and new defence are effectively the same. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
This should be the end of the story and this was supported in Genetech Inc’s Patent [1989] RPC 147. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
The Supreme Court’s framework for evaluating contract impairment claims involves a three-prong analysis announced in Energy Reserves Grp, Inc v Kansas Power & Light Co. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
The second day of the December calendar presents a case that almost certainly will divide the Justices – Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
These risks are highlighted by the California Supreme Court decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Steel appealed the award of benefits to plaintiff, the widow of a deceased miner, under the black lung benefits program. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
