Search for: "State of Maine v. Peters" Results 241 - 260 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
The first decisions by the Central Division Munich, the Local Division Paris and the Local Division Düsseldorf adjudging a patent’s validity in main proceedings are now out. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
These are the main questions addressed by Peter Lee, Professor of Law at University of California, Davis, in his new article, "Patents and the University," forthcoming in the Duke Law Journal. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The last case in this category I want to look at is the Spycatcher trial (HM Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Zoe Tillman
Terry survived, however, and served as the government's main eyewitness at trial. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In the Guardian, Peter Preston argues “vulgar abuse has been part of the way we conduct our public business“. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Lester said “the main beneficiaries of the current state of the law are the rich and powerful and their lawyers, who will mount a rearguard action against reform. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago… [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
In the case law on this exception, institutions have generally presented two main rationales for secrecy (see Peters and Ankersmit for an overview). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
By trial, the main issue in dispute was whether the Patent was obvious over one piece of prior art: Australian patent application 199889288 (“AU 228“). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
The British publisher Peter McGee (Albertas) behind the Zeitungszeugen sees matters differently and wants to make the historic content available to the public. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
If Peter sues Diane for medical malpractice and loses, the ruling prevents Peter from bringing the same claim against Diane again. [read post]