Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 241 - 260
of 928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
That request will be ‘subject only to medical examination and the approval of the Chancellor,’ so long as reinstatement is made in accordance with the timing requirements set forth in the Regulation. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:03 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures) back in 2005): “ . . . the IRE becomes an item of evidence just as would the results of any medical examination the claimant submitted to at the request of his employer. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:02 pm
Likewise, the employer cannot require an employee to pay for a medical or physical examination required by any federal, state or local law or regulation. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
This cheat sheet deals only with individual states – no issues of nationwide statutory service of process.To help our readers, we note in each case if it is: (1) a prescription medical product liability case; (2) a product liability case not involving a prescription medical product; or (3) it’s not a product liability case at all. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
In the United States, about 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events occur every year. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:06 am
First, DeepMind argued that the Board of Appeal had breached its duty to state the reasons for its finding that even if the proposed limitation to the specification had been permissible, this would not have affected the outcome. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
In Liveringhouse v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:51 pm
The court was also unpersuaded by the finding in a federal lawsuit, Arkansas Dept. of Health & Human Servs. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
" That provision states that the Texas Medical Board "shall take an appropriate disciplinary action against a physician who violates . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
Medical Licensing Board of Indiana (NFP) - "Appellant-petitioner Gregory L. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:50 am
Hamilton is qualified to opine as a general medical expert and that any question of his specialization should be discussed on cross-examination. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
For example, in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:46 am
(See Brower v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:13 pm
The bottom line in Ivera v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In Baker v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:37 am
Matter of Wayman Neely v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner brought about this Article 78 appeal to review a determination of the Comptroller denying him his applications for accidental and performance of duty disability retirement benefits. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Wallace, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:14 pm
The court compared it to a prior Massachusetts case, Kniskern v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Patton State Hospital, State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm
” Aurora also noted that the Wisconsin State Licensing Board had previously disciplined Dr. [read post]
