Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 241 - 260
of 19,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
Says the first commenter on David Kopel's post that stresses Holder's "strong support" of gun control -- he co-signed an amicus brief in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 12:15 pm
In Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm
Isabelle V. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:18 pm
Today the Court issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
" Medlin v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:31 pm
Wyers v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
Weideman Today the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Costco v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
Weideman Today the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Costco v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:17 am
See Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:50 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 2:30 am
The post <strong>U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:28 pm
A nine-strong bench will hear the cases, consisting of Lords [...] [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:29 am
See KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:48 pm
By Jason Rantanen Mintz v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:58 am
No, as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Schlossberg v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
Sahyers v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Amusingly, there is a split between Trump and his enablers, with everyone but Trump wishing that he would become “disciplined” and talk about his supposed strong suit. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:29 am
What happens when a three-judge panel (1) issues three separate opinions, (2) has a dubious holding (at least as I saw it), (3) contains, in the words of the concurrence, a "strong dissent," and (4) even the concurring judge says that the case is at "the outer limits of our tolerance" for official misconduct and expressly concurs only "with deep regret"? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:32 am
That was very much on display in Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in today’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
