Search for: "T THOMAS" Results 241 - 260 of 23,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am by Dan Farber
   And the core ultraconservative group (Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch) seem eager to undo as much of the last century of federal regulation as possible. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:43 am by Daniel J. Gilman
And don’t get me started on the European Commission, but I don’t stop there anyway. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
In a concurring opinion, Justice Thomas noted that a plaintiff asserting a Title VII claim must show more than trifling harm. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:58 pm by Josh Blackman
This is a case where Justices Thomas and Alito clearly voted against their interest. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas told Prelogar that “there have been many violent protests that have interfered with proceedings. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
[The Court allows takings suit against Texas to proceed under state law, but doesn't resolve question of whether the Takings Clause is "self-executing. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:27 am by Yosi Yahoudai
But this time she didn’t even try, going straight for the backup flame, kept in a copy of an ancient Greek pot. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
"   Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito, issued a concurring opinion, saying in part:The district court issued this sweeping relief even though, by its own admission, the plaintiffs had failed to “engage” with other provisions of Idaho’s law that don’t presently affect them—including the law’s provisions prohibiting the surgical removal of children’s genitals.... [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
"Listen folks, if the law couldn't be applied to books then it can't be applied to movies, and the government had to lose. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm by Amy Howe
The order entered by the district court, Gorsuch wrote, “purported to bar the enforcement of ‘any provision’ of the law against anyone … even though, by its own admission, the plaintiffs had failed to ‘engage’ with other provisions of Idaho’s law that don’t presently affect them. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:01 pm by Joe Patrice
Clarence Thomas made like a massive financial gift on his annual disclosure forms and just didn't show up. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm
" We all could likely add additional cases that didn't result in opinions in the Court of Appeals.)At a minimum, we can all at least hope that the number of these cases diminishes in the future, right? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am by Guest Author
  But as Corner Post acknowledged at oral argument in response to questioning from Justice Clarence Thomas, neither Herr nor any other decided case offers the general rule that the six-year limitations period accrues for APA claims when a plaintiff acquires standing. [read post]