Search for: "US v. Ellis" Results 241 - 260 of 816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
 | Weekly roundup: Friday Fun Never too late 107 [week ending on Sunday 31 July] Article 28 declarations |Costs of ISP blocking injunctions |Friday Fantasies, featuring legal challenges to Brexit and  more |Huawei v Samsung |Hospira v Genentech |Questions on Article 3(b) SPC referred to CJEU |Book Review: Trade Secret Protection |Pokémon GoNever too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] |… [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One "Ellie Light" has been writing "letters to the editor" in support of President Obama. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:10 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Carris, 238 F.3d 1268, 1271-73 (10th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (noting that ghost-writing pleadings for pro se parties violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102(A)(4)); Ellis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
The ambiguity prevented the Agreement from being used as unambiguous support for the Ellis' argument that private lands were unaffected. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:09 am
., Serial No.88359361 [Refusal to register FLIPPABLE FIRMNESS for "Online retail store services featuring bed frames, foundations, mattresses, pillows, toppers, and bed sheets" on the ground that the specimen of use does not show use of the mark in connection with the services identified in the application.]May 18, 2022 - 1 PM: Evolutionary Guidance Media R&D Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareMythological creatures and French literary heroes appeared during argument in Thompson v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:12 am by Glenn Rosen
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, at 589, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (setting forth the trial judge's gatekeeping obligation to ensure that prospective expert testimony is reliable).3See Ellis v. [read post]