Search for: "In re R. F." Results 2621 - 2640 of 10,009
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2017, 2:45 am by Scott Bomboy
Today is the birthday of the late former President, Gerald R. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:50 pm
Alvarez & Benedict Kingsbury, AJIL AT 111 Articles Steven R. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As one group of justices for whom Justice Alito wrote put the point (in a way the other group likely would accept too), “[i]f private speech could be passed off as government speech by simply affixing a government seal of approval, government could silence or muffle the expression of disfavored viewpoints” quite easily.In the Tam case, Justice Alito’s opinion (for himself and three others) said it is “far-fetched to suggest that the content of a registered trademark… [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by Michael Geist
Section 29  of the Copyright Act  states that “[f]air dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
De la sorte, le but du droit des brevets est atteint quand le titulaire a reçu sa rémunération pour l'usage de la chose. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:42 am by Miquel Montañá
This means that the usefulness of the publication must be demonstrated, as a means of re-establishing the damaged image of the sign and ensuring cessation of all of the effects of the infringement or any other that merits protection”. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:42 am by Miquel Montañá
This means that the usefulness of the publication must be demonstrated, as a means of re-establishing the damaged image of the sign and ensuring cessation of all of the effects of the infringement or any other that merits protection”. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:28 pm by Elie Mystal
[CNN] * I try to bother you with Alt-Right news only on Friday, but I had to check in with how they're handling the Don Trump Jr. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
In re Petrobras Securities, No. 16-1914-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:59 am
Dept. or Labor & Industry:Reading the Personnel Files Act according to its plain terms, we conclude that former employees, who were not laid off with re-employment rights and who are not on a leave of absence, have no right to access their personnel files pursuant to the Act, regardless of how quickly following termination they request to do so.That sounds right to me. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:37 pm by Jim Sedor
But the Center for Public Integrity gives Montana an “F” grade for its conflict disclosure laws, which make it difficult for the public to spot self-serving votes or sanction those who enrich themselves in public office. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
See Brockmeyer, 383 F. 3d, at 803–804.Secondary sources: B. [read post]