Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
Scalia concurrence).Bennett v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
At the federal level, this hostility resulted in the near passage of an amendment to the United States Constitution prohibiting any state funding of “sectarian” schools. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:10 pm
United States resurrecting the Rule of Lenity (or completing the task started by DOM's fav justice- Scalia) . [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
The United States District Court of the Northern District of Florida made a landmark decision in Brenner, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Holmes' admonition in his now-vindicated dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
In that same footnote, Justice Stevens also quoted United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
The Court ruled 6-3 on March 25 in Young v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
There are two new articles about Justice Scalia’s comments during last week’s argument in the Second Amendment case McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
Do you want the Supreme Court to overturn Citizens United or Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
Scalia joined his fellow opera lover RBG in the majority. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:41 am
The United States analogue is Griswold v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
” By contrast, she observed that her favorite decisions were United States v. [read post]
