Search for: "State v. Taylor " Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance PI comments on Taylor Swift’s alleged use of facial recognition software at a kiosk in a recent concert, which scanned users face’s without consent and compared them to those documented to pose a security risk to her. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
With respect to the arbitrary and unrealistic time deadlines, the authors look for support in DeLaune v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:42 am by Paul Horwitz
 (See also the CLS case, and the famous Mozert v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
My motivation for doing this has nothing to do with jumping headfirst to the other side of the “v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
My motivation for doing this has nothing to do with jumping headfirst to the other side of the “v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:00 am by Jessica Dorsey
In other tribunal news, the ECHR will begin hearings on an extraordinary rendition case today, Al Masri v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
” Washington Post“Johnson & Johnson’s one-shot vaccine is allowing states to rethink distribution, even as health officials and experts worry some will view it as inferior. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Richard Hasen looks ahead to the anticipated decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]