Search for: "Does 1-75"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§240.10A-3 & 10c-1. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§240.10A-3 & .10c-1. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:45 pm
For example, in WCAT-2013-02657 at paras. 75-85, it was said: [85] In summary, although Ms. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§§240.10A-3 & .10c-1. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
§§ 240.10A-3, 240.10C-1. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
§§ 240.10A-3, 240.10C-1. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
See CRPC Rule 1-100 and its implied exclusion of non-lawyers not employed/contracted by lawyers. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:10 am
My newest book, Tennessee Law of Civil Trial, will be released on July 1, 2014 and may be ordered now for July 1 delivery. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:52 pm
I’ve earned my street cred covering this biz for 28 years and starting Deadline Hollywood Daily by myself from ground zero 8 1/2 years ago. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court held this approach unconstitutional for (1) failing to take into account the standard error of measurement (SEM) that applies to an I.Q. score and thus renders any score number imprecise as a measure of intellectual disability and, therefore, for (2) failing to allow a condemned prisoner with an I.Q. score between 71 and 75 the opportunity to offer other evidence of intellectual disability, including adaptive deficits. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Instead it follows its own method, but does not always satisfy state requirements. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
While, unlike the OVDP, a “quiet disclosure” does not “guarantee” a taxpayer of no criminal prosecution, the practical result and the experience of practitioners who have assisted clients who have made quiet disclosures is that there is a very small likelihood of a criminal prosecution for two principal reasons: (1) Voluntary compliance results and is generally encouraged in our tax system, and (2) there is little to no incentive to… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
This position gives rise to the following questions:1) Is the exercise of the power to promulgate Ordinances amenable to judicial review (is it justiciable)? [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
To be sure, an IQ of 75 does not necessarily mean that the defendant wins; this merely permits the defendant to present evidence of poor adaptive functioning. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 am
When this situation arises, how does the DLHWC resolve the problem? [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:02 pm
I did get a late start on August 1, 2013. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am
" Thus, for pleading purposes, the court ruled that the complaint need not specify the actual law, rule or regulation violated, although it must identify the particular activities, policies or practices in which the employer allegedly engaged, so that the complaint provides the employer with notice of the alleged complained-of conduct.The Court of Appeals observed that in order to recover under a Labor Law §740 theory, the plaintiff has the burden of proving [1] that an actual… [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
It does not require that the person that you send the communication to is the same person that you intend to harass, annoy and alarm. [read post]
