Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
The court did not consider or decide whether a paid suspension constitutes an adverse action in the retaliation context, however (Jones v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
See Vernonia School District 47J v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 1984); Jones v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
District Judge Robert B. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR… [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 1:24 am
Jones, 529 U.S. at 856 (quoting Russell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Whether the rational basis standard of review should be used to evaluate DOMA is also before Judge Barbara Jones of the Southern District of New York in Windsor v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting))) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
HILL, Jr., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.No. 05-13-01634-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.Opinion Filed January 26, 2016.773*773 On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:08 am
Judge Jones wrote a separate concurring opinion emphasizing the court’s admonition that the case ought to be terminated expeditiously and at minimum cost to the employer (Pineda v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
Last week in the Courts There was an unsuccessful application to set aside judgment in Barron MP & Anor v Vines, heard by Sir David Eady on 16 February 2016. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
The plaintiffs sought reconsideration from the district court. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court Justices determined in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Bureau of Customs & Border Protection, et al., No. 1:17-cv-02412, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Bureau of Customs & Border Protection, et al., No. 1:17-cv-02412, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Bureau of Customs & Border Protection, et al., No. 1:17-cv-02412, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Dep’t of Transp.Citation: 2011 WY 1Docket Number: S-10-0063URL: http://tinyurl.com/22p97rnAppeal from the District Court of Goshen County, The Honorable Keith G. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
