Search for: "MATTER OF M W"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
Attorney Robert W. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
Frederick W. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
And I’m sure that if I did, I’d get more than my fair share of dirty looks. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
Fedarcyk, Assistant Director-In-Charge of the New York Office of the FBI; and Raymond W. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
Andrea M. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
Jonathan Schell is the Doris M. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
., James W. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
., James W. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
Now, I’m just not sure whether that is good enough because, whatever the intent of the Commission, that cannot be relied on as an interpretive canon in the face of the express words of the Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:27 am
I realize that I'm treading on some very thin ice, primarily because as a matter of law, it makes it very clear that there can be a voluntary dismissal, abandonment. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
Attorney Robert W. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
Attorney Robert W. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:47 pm
I’m skeptical. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:55 pm
I'm skeptical. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
What was it that George W said "fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on your cat? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
Appeal covered judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), damages, obviousness, willfulness, and award of attorneys fees. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm
On motion for judg- ment as a matter of law, the district court discussed the evidence and concluded that the jury findings were sup- ported by substantial evidence, that obviousness had not been proved by clear and convincing evidence, and that the jury verdict was not a miscarriage of justice. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
[Opponent’s] argument, that claim 1 refers to an essentially biological process for the protection of plants which is excluded from patentability according to A 53(b), must therefore fail.[6] For the following consideration of the requirements of A 53(b), the board has to draw the parties’ attention to the exact wording of this Article, which reads:“European patents shall not be granted in respect of:(b) plant or animal varieties or essentially biological processes for the… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:34 am
Lisa Myers, Rich Gardella and John W. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
[and] recommended the billboard be taken down by 8:15 a.m. on June 16.Twelfth Judicial District Judge James W. [read post]
