Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 2661 - 2680 of 42,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 5:08 am by Florian Mueller
There must be evidence of actual importation into the United States, and it looks like Ericsson does have such evidence, but Samsung still argues that "the new designs are not properly part of this [i]nvestigation because Ericsson has not shown that they wil be incorporated into any product for a United States customer". [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:52 am by R. David Donoghue
  Without ruling upon the credibility of testimony or making a factual finding, the Court ruled upon the admissibility of the Power Point presentation as follows: Evidence was introduced that could lead a jury to believe statements in the Power Point presentation were false or misleading. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
That doctrine did not apply here, explained the Supreme Court, because the appellate court’s function is, in fact, to revisit matters decided in the trial court, and the appeals court was not bound by district court rulings. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 7:44 am by Neil Wilkof
That said, the CJEU has ruled that perception of the average consumer might differ in the case of a three-dimensional, as compared to a two-dimensional, trademark (e.g., T 862/19). [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Donziger’s compliance with post-judgment discovery orders in the RICO matter. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
 Not mentioned in the Seventh Circuit's decision is Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which says: (d) Result of Presenting Matters Outside the Pleadings. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
 Not mentioned in the Seventh Circuit's decision is Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which says: (d) Result of Presenting Matters Outside the Pleadings. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
 Not mentioned in the Seventh Circuit's decision is Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which says: (d) Result of Presenting Matters Outside the Pleadings. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm by Maxine Neuhauser
As a general matter, the Rule provides broad protection for the confidentiality of covered communications. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The government appealed this ruling, but their appeal was dismissed. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:26 am
The Board cranked out just over a dozen precedential decisions this quarter: in two of the more interesting rulings, it gave a lukewarm welcome to Wikipedia evidence, but the back of its hand to the Wayback Machine. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:13 am by Eugene Volokh
I’m happy to be strict about the rules in math, or in physics, or for that matter in law, because there’s some basis for the rules. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Considering Employee's testimony and the medical proof elaborating on the severe effects that the discrimination had on her, the Appellate Division ruled that the award “is reasonably related to the wrongdoing, supported by substantial evidence and comparable to awards for similar injuries. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
The court ruled in favour of the defendants, Warshaw and Chase Manhattan. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the evidence permits contrary inferences: that the son suffered from major depression and that defendants knew that he had to live with his parents.When the Court of Appeals reinstates a claim that was dismissed during trial (or that the district court rejects despite a plaintiff's verdict), the Second Circuit provides a good summary of the legal standards governing judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The result in this appeal possibly could have been avoided or ameliorated by careful adherence to the rules of evidence and the burden of proof. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 9:13 am
Nifong" --or false comments to the Court --or any matters relating to the Bar --or any "alleged agreement" between Nifong and Meehan "I'm not sure I really under stand the State Bar's position" re the therefore allegations Constitutional claim of Bar: state bar needs clear, cogent, and convincing evidence Williamson: Is a Brady violation necessary for a violation of Rule 320.18 Witt: No appropriate guidelines, need to… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
”  Generally reviewing decisions from around Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, this court in Raianoted that “the rulings from the State and Federal courts have run the gamut, State courts are much more willing to sever and stay proceedings in some form or fashion, while Federal courts tend to deny these motions and keep the matters consolidated. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 12:55 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
Neither the New Jersey Code of Juvenile Justice nor the New Jersey Court Rules expressly address discovery in juvenile matters. [read post]