Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2681 - 2700 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court said that the evidence showed that questions that could lead to an applicant’s “automatic” disqualification concerned the applicant’s “legal documentation to work in the United States,” his or her willingness to undergo a criminal background check and employment reference check, his or her willingness to submit to a drug test, whether the applicant states the he or she is able to perform the essential functions of the job, and… [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
The agreement contained a clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction on a court in the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
  Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:23 am
In 1993, Horphag was granted the United States trademark for the mark Pycnogenol. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge Baer) held that these claims were precluded under Morrison because the plaintiffs’ transactions were the functional equivalent of transactions in VW stock, which was not traded in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:21 am by Ronald Mann
The trend appears largely, if not entirely, in cases against the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
EAI operates a franchise network of over 1,200 independent owner-operated franchise locations throughout the United States and internationally. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
This article investigates the quirks of the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a), which provides a right-of-publicity-style ground of refusal of registration to celebrities, universities with nicknames, and international companies seeking protection of their well-known marks in the United States (where those companies are not using such marks)—and without a showing of trademark rights, use in commerce, or likelihood of confusion. [read post]