Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 47,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
§ 1361, federal courts may issue writs of “mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 6:07 pm
G063224) 2024 WL 3869450, at *1 Summary: Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “once a vehicle has been lawfully detained for a traffic violation, a police officer may order the driver to exit the vehicle without any articulable justification. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am
"].May 16, 2012 - 2 PM: Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:58 pm
On May 22, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s finding of summary judgement upholding the constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act’s regulation of the use of so-called soft money. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:02 am
We note, for example, that after we first issued our opinion, the United States Copyright Office sent Garcia a letter denying her request to register a copyright in her performance. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
This time it's the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ordering summary judgment for the United States on March 10, 2009 in an interpleader action styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v Carrie R. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
United States, 519U.S. 172, 183 n.7 (1997); United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm
A cert petition has been filed seeking review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:26 pm
" [See Allen v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
”The President, with the State Budget Director's approval, then adopted a Regulation that reduced the State's contribution for health insurance premiums not only for employees in State’s several negotiating units that had agreed to the reductions through collective bargaining, but also for some “nonunionized employees” and retirees of the State as the employer. [read post]
