Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 9,190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
" Brown v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Supreme Court to step in and resolve the matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:59 am
Make a donation to fuel our work and sign up for future opportunities to take action in the fight for justice and opportunity for all.Trevor Brown contributed to this blog post.State-Level Advocacy Advances Justice and Opportunity in Illinois was originally published in Shriver Center on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
To be poor, black, and brown has historically meant being subjected to heightened police surveillance. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Plus: We’re Not Done With Dunsmuir During the playoffs, ice hockey is the delight of everyone, to paraphrase Brown J in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
And sometimes a seemingly outrageous request has a legitimate purpose, as most famously embodied by Van Halen’s prohibition of brown M&Ms. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
Jerry Brown. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:42 am
Currently, the VA only recognizes “Brown Water” Veterans: those that stepped foot in the locations mentioned and those that served in the water inlets of those countries. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:40 am
§ 2635.502(c) gives the agency’s ethics official authority to “make an independent determination as to whether a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts would be likely to question the employee’s impartiality in the matter. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:49 am
Look to the Brown Law Offices for loyal advocacy when you need it most. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
The prospect of a rule on the matter is “good news,” says John Lovett, an editor of Kentucky Employment Law Letter and attorney with Frost Brown Todd LLC in Louisville, Kentucky, because a federal agency rule is harder to reverse “when and if the political winds change. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
The prospect of a rule on the matter is “good news,” says John Lovett, an editor of Kentucky Employment Law Letter and attorney with Frost Brown Todd LLC in Louisville, Kentucky, because a federal agency rule is harder to reverse “when and if the political winds change. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
The Panopticon Blog has considered a recent judgement involving a Facebook Fan Page handed down by the European Court of Justice, the case addresses a number of pertinent issues around the jurisdiction of data protection regulators in cross border matters and the responsibilities’ of data controllers in relation to cookies. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:48 am
Although the majority opinion acknowledged that the efficacy of class action waivers in arbitration agreements is, “[a]s a matter of policy[,]” debatable, it ruled that “as a matter of law the answer is clear”—federal courts must enforce arbitration agreements in accordance with their terms, including those that require individualized arbitration. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:33 pm
But those concerns took on new relevancy at AT&T when it became public that the company paid $600,000 to Cohen to advise on various matters. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
Governor Brown vetoed AB 465 in 2015, which would have prohibited the use of mandatory arbitration agreements as a condition of employment. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:09 pm
Experience and results matter. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:38 am
Stymied in its efforts to undo its Obama-era Browning-Ferris decision, which expanded the definition of “joint employer” and thereby increased potential liability under the NLRA for companies that utilize contingent workforce and franchise arrangements, the NLRB on May 9 announced it was considering resolving the matter through issuance of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 7:49 am
& G.E.D., YINC DA 17-0680 2018 MT 136N Civil – Dependent Neglect Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
Well, before Browning-Ferris, the Board would evaluate “whether alleged joint employers share the ability to control or co-determine essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
