Search for: "JOHN DOE #1, an individual"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,087
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 4:30 pm
How does Kevin feel about using the same Twitter account for professional AND personal stuff? [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm
In sprouts, the seed can, and does, carry the foodborne illness pathogen. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:33 am
Chief Justice John Roberts opens his salvo thusly: As the text indicates and we have repeatedly affirmed, “the ultimate touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is ‘reasonableness. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
” (By contrast, the Court also noted that an individual officer’s mistaken view, “no matter how reasonable,” that he has complied with the Fourth Amendment, does not undermine a reviewing court’s “ultimate conclusion” that governmental actions have violated the Fourth Amendment – even though it might affect the remedy. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
Giants of the law such as John Henry Wigmore and Benjamin Cardozo denounced the rule, and rightly so. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
If someone were to call John Doe on the telephone and say that he plans to blow up Doe’s child’s school today, then Doe would probably feel extremely scared, keep his child home from school, and maybe also notify the school office of the threat and thereby motivate the school to close for the day, pending a bomb squad clearance of the school grounds. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
Grantee #1 does not have to prove that the grantee #2 somehow had actual knowledge of the sale or transfer to grantee #1. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
Rev. 845 (1992).Optional· The Role of Text and Precedent, John F. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
"Citing Baker v Poughkeepsie City School District, 18 NY3d 714, the court said that “[a]lthough a particular individual's involvement or participation in the disciplinary process does not automatically compel his or her recusal, the case law makes clear that "individuals who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the… [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers (2013) - Judgment John Catt was the second individual to challenge FIT surveillance in the courts. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers (2013) - Judgment John Catt was the second individual to challenge FIT surveillance in the courts. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:55 am
Remember John Steele, Paul Hansmeier and Paul Duffy, best known from reports as being the attorneys behind controversial 'troll' company Prenda Law ? [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:30 pm
And without it, they have no case.Steve Legomsky is John S. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Madison,[1]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)· Cooper v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:22 am
Noting that compensation is the number one focus of the OFCCP, Copus, along with John C. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:35 am
Republican House Speaker John Boehner has vowed to fight Obama’s action and has accused him of acting unlawfully. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:52 pm
John Young, Ari Ne'eman, and Sara Gelser, Bullying and Students With Disabilities, in White House Conference on Bullying Prevention, at 74 (March 10, 2011), available athttp://www.stopbullying.gov/references/white_house_conference/index.html. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
1. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich,[1] 545 U.S. 1 (2005) Supreme Court of the United StatesAlberto R. [read post]
