Search for: "JOHN DOE EMPLOYER" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,713
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by WIMS
But all of that will go into the mix in terms of John Kerry's decision or recommendation on this issue. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:17 am by Adam Kielich
However, that does not mean the worker center itself is always a labor organization under LMRDA. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
McDougall had named “John/Jane Doe as a person to be subsequently named” in the caption, the Commissioner said that the record indicates that at the time Ms. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm by Barry Barnett
Does Justice Alito understand this? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:06 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Data Gathering Brian Burke can serve John Doe defendants through the private message feature on a message board Ontario court restates employer responsibility in managing sexual harassment, refuses to accept antiquated excuses Court petition seeks EPA action on pesticide drift New website makes it easier to compare law-school jobs data Cameron’s UK Online Porn Crackdown Principal in India Tainted Lunch Deaths Is Arrested Manitoba Mennonite community gets help… [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
But they can arise from claims of trade secrets theft, because disgruntled employees often feel as though the public has a right to know of certain non-public information concerning a company's business practices, services, or products.In our episode of Fairly Competing, John, Russell, and I discussed a particularly interesting suit in California in which James Clark accused Anheuser-Busch (his ex-employer) of filing a SLAPP suit. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:42 am by Susan Brenner
`Both inquiries focus on a person's intent at the time of accessing the computer, not on a person's subsequent misappropriation of the information or thing of value obtained from the employer's computer. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
During an interview on CBS News, House Speaker John Boehner let a bit more of the agenda cat out of the bag when responding to an accusatory question. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:52 pm by Robin E. Shea
John Holmquist of Michigan Employment Law Connection explains the EEOC's position on criminal background checks. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:28 pm
  They’ll make random calls to employer firms, and ask whoever answers the phone, “Is John Doe employed here, and does he or his family make $X thousands of dollars? [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Clark County School Dist. http://t.co/ASaOqFa1AT -> The Morals of Grabbing Free Content From the Web http://t.co/X5tdzqkYl4 -> New law restricts employers’ requests for social media info http://t.co/OmOrFPfbYe -> Supreme Court modifies conflicts of interest rules for lawyers http://t.co/6Gi4Blbf6k -> Russia starts up new IP court http://t.co/EJPn4N1OoL -> The first arrest filmed on Google Glass? [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
An employer is always free to negotiate drug and alcohol testing policies with the union. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 5:51 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Some of the federal power to select projects deserving of special-purpose employment-based visas should be conferred on the states. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
John’s University, USA (invited) Perry Dane, Rutgers University School of Law, USA, “Endorsement, Legal Reason, and the Misguided Quest for Reasonableness” Javier Martinez-Torron, Complutense University School of Law, Spain, “Institutional Religious Symbols, State Neutrality and Protection of Minorities” Session 2 – Hate speech, hate crimes and religious minorities H. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:11 am by Staci Zaretsky
What does that mean for you? [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:48 pm by Jon Gelman
The reasoning supporting the DOMA decision supports state fair-employment statutes. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm by admin
Shragge) ____________________ “In the absence of any purpose to create or maintain a monopoly, the [Sherman Act] does not restrict the long recognized right of trader or manufacturer engaged in an entirely private business, freely to exercise his own independent discretion as to parties with whom he will deal; and, of course, he may announce in advance the circumstances under which he will refuse to sell. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:53 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
John the Fifth Circuit concluded that the defendant violated the CFAA when she used her authorized access to her employer’s computerized records to make copies of customer account information as part of a fraudulent scheme. [read post]