Search for: "Does 1 - 75" Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Code, § 65962.5(c)(1)), but the RWQCB issued a closure letter finding no further corrective action was needed in January 2007, resulting in “case closed” status for the site. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:55 am by Alan Monk
 Under the CCGP and the revised policy, ISS will not recommend voting against a stock option plan that provides for non-employee director participation, provided that the plan stipulates that the number of stock options that may be granted to non-employee directors in the aggregate does not exceed 0.25 percent (for larger companies) to 1 percent (for smaller companies) of outstanding shares of the company and option grants to non-employee directors does not exceed… [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by David Markus
§ 1324a(a)(1)(A), (a)(2), and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
It is also a fundamental tenet that copyright does not protect all copying from a work. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
Ames does in fact cite structure and materials similar to the claimed invention. ... [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:54 pm by Jonathan Bailey
They will then be given the chance to choose an image size, ranging from “Square”, which is 75×75 pixels, all the way up to the largest size available for the image, which is often the original size. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
”Section 75 defines who “qualifying tenants” are. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
”Section 75 defines who “qualifying tenants” are. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:38 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:38 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:38 pm by Lloyd Jassin
  Out-of-print does not mean out-of-copyright. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Employee sued the school district, contending that, among other things, his termination was unlawful and that he was entitled, pursuant to the provisions of Civil Service Law §63(1), to return to his previous position of "custodial worker. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
In a 2-to-1 decision, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that various NCAA Football Video games made by Electronic Arts (EA) did not sufficiently transform Hart’s identity. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:09 am by Dorsey
  Under this rule, a non-compete agreement is enforceable if: (1) the covenant is limited to time and place; (2) the covenant is based on a good consideration; and (3) the covenant affords a reasonable protection for and does not impose an unreasonable burden upon the employer, the employee or the public. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:42 am by David DePaolo
The reason for IMR is to alleviate judicial intervention and while an appeal doesn't take the matter back to the adjudication level it does unnecessarily delay the treatment decision.The proposed rules entertain concepts that are not part of SB 863, are not necessary to IMR functionality, and do not further the concept of expeditious review of medical decisions.Let's stop fooling around. [read post]