Search for: "Fell v. Fell" Results 2761 - 2780 of 12,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The reason that Parliament was wrong was set out in the case of MacDonald v Fernandez where no less a personage than Hale LJ (as she then was) held that an s21 notice was not a notice to quit and hence that the s21 regime fell outside the common law notice to quit regime. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Va. 1985); andthe Lundberg test recently adopted by the Kansas Court of Appeals, which unifies these two approaches (State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court has recently handed down judgment in the case of JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov, which is part of the long-running litigation between the two parties in which the claimant Bank has had judgment entered against Mr Ablyazov for an aggregate sum of $4.4 billion. [read post]