Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Superior Court (“Powerine I”) 24 Cal.4th 945. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Div. 1957), Innes v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 8:58 am
In City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:38 am
(The Court also granted review of Brinkley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:18 am
Superior Court of California, 137 S.Ct. 1773 (2017). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:50 pm
Superior Ct. 2005) in which Google sued an alleged click fraudster and won a $75k default judgment; and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
Four years later, the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:35 pm
The court in the present case, Forkwar v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
Ohio March 29, 2010) held that CAFA did not grant additional counterclaim defendants the right to remove, represented a superior analysis of the scope of §1453(b). [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
In March 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court held in Salzburg v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Employee required to answer employer's work-related inquiriesSpielbauer v County of Santa Clara [Calif.], Supreme Court of California, decided February 9, 2009. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:14 pm
Accordingly, we grant the petition and order the superior court to vacate its order granting class certification and enter a new order denying certification of plaintiffs' proposed class. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
(Note: Bush v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Supreme Court in Troxel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 10:59 pm
On remand, the trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Riverwood Farm. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:10 am
Following a jury verdict of willful infringement, the court granted plaintiff's motion for enhanced damages. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Boston police officer union denied injunction to temporarily block body-worn camera test By Dave Strausfeld, J.D.Posted in Wolters Kluwer's WorkDayhttp://www.employmentlawdaily.com/A union of Boston police officers was not entitled to an injunction to temporarily block implementation of a pilot program to test body-worn cameras, held a Massachusetts Superior Court judge. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford Division (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm
The judge who heard the case in the Superior Court agreed, and denied the motion on that basis. [read post]
