Search for: "4 What It's Worth, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 1,248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
• A party does not waive the attorney-client privilege by designating its attorney as an expert on fees.(8) In re City of Dickinson, 568 S.W.3d 642, 649 (Tex. 2019). 4. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In a jury trial, the actual studies relied upon are rarely admissible, and so the jury almost never has the opportunity to read them to make its own determination of reasonableness of reliance, or of whether the study and its data really support what the expert witness draws from it. [read post]
3 May 2020, 1:54 pm
Indeed, what makes the meaning of surveillance so interesting in the shadow of COVID-19 is the way on which what had been obvious about surveillance before January 2020, no longer seems to apply. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
This judgment represents another tour de force on patent law and practice in the UK from one of its most remarkable Judges. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Eric Goldman
That’s not what the magistrate did–even as it relied on the opinion to support a contrary conclusion. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Because Justice Powell's sole vote in the 4-1-4 split cannot set a precedent. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
A new decision issued by a federal judge in the case Itserve Alliance Inc., et al., v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by MOTP
Thanks to the jurisprudential protectionism the Texas High Court has bestowed upon its most captive audience, Texas attorneys now have the right to terminate lawsuits against them by flashing their bar card—as it were. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
It is worth recalling that - as early as 2010 - Arnold J (as he then was), in SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2010] EWHC 1829 (Ch) (23 July 2010), noted that:In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:23 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]