Search for: "California v. EPA"
Results 261 - 280
of 681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
See California v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:41 pm
Have you seen any of the videos produced by California-based law firm Allen Matkins? [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am
EPA - May 9. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
See, e.g., California v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:53 am
In Barnum Timber v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:38 am
UPDATE: The parties in International Center for Technology Assessment et al v Hamburg, in a stipulation filed with the court on January 13, 2012, agreed to grant the EPA " an extension of time to April 23, 2012 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint". [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
True, EPA has authority to curb carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act, as the Supreme Court recognized in Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
” (Morehart v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:35 pm
EPA, in which the Court expressly named and relied on the major questions doctrine for the first time. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:31 pm
McKee (Tribal Jurisdiction; Water Rights) Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:57 pm
Supreme Court when the justices took up the question of whether the Clean Air Act requires the EPA to regulate GHGs in the landmark Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
Vehicle Emissions – The California Waiver and Ohio v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:51 am
In the years 2004 and 2005, IPBiz covered the Clyde Bryant v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am
EPA “curtails EPA’s permitting rules in any way,” the resulting “flurry of press releases claiming the decision casts doubt on EPA’s power plant standards . . . will be wrong. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]