Search for: "Common Cause v. Lewis" Results 261 - 280 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm by Jacek Stramski
That Petition is before the Court in Florida House of Representatives, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Lewis, 19-185 [Disclosure: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioners in this case.]Issues: (1) Whether a plaintiff can preclude conduct-based immunity for foreign government officials merely by suing them in their personal capacities; and (2) whether the Torture Victim Protection Act abrogates all common-law conduct-based immunity for foreign officials, as the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
On remand, the court of appeals again denied a certificate of appealability, holding that Pena-Rodriguez did not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review, and that Tharpe had failed to show cause to excuse his procedural default. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
“It is, however, only a district court decision, and I doubt that it will cause plaintiffs’ counsel to stop bringing these lawsuits entirely,” he predicted. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Invalidity (of '373) Creative tried to lower the bar to invalidity from the clear-and-convincing standard, arguing common claimed subject matter. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
The University of Virginia School of Law's culture in the 1980s was the culture of Justice Lewis Powell, the Justice from Richmond, Virginia who (erroneously) thought he had never met a "homosexual" and who was willing to join the Court's opinion in Bowers v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm by Ken White
Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 19, 110 S.Ct. 2695, 2706, 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); Lewis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm by Ken White
Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 19, 110 S.Ct. 2695, 2706, 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); Lewis v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The proposed new legislation includes a definition of what defamation is and introduces a new threshold of causing ‘serious harm’. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Both writers argued in favour of the new single publication rule, which would bury the 160 year old common law authority, Duke of Brunswick v Harmer, that is the basis for the legal interpretation of every download of an online article as a new publication. [read post]