Search for: "Cross v. Robinson" Results 261 - 280 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
(3) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the second degree if serious bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) while: (a) on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property; (b) driving through a school crossing as defined in R.S.39:1-1 if the… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Pace Law School Library
Lancaster Jr., chair; Ralph Gillis, David Colson, Davis Robinson and Judge Stephen M. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
The Teacher’s Perspective Instant knowledge Véronique Abad The obvious character for me would be Mr Spock! [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by Daniel Richardson
  Following this decision, the Town appealed, and Petitioner cross-appealed the denial of punitive damages. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
Id. at 23. (4) Finally, the defendant argued that the trial court erred by allowing cross-examination of his father and contended the State elicited irrelevant testimony from his father. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Wisconsin: UCP of Greater Dane County 1502 Greenway Cross Madison, WI 53713 Phone: (608) 273-4434 Fax: (608) 273-3426 E-mail: camilla@ucpdane.org Web: http://www.ucpdane.org UCP of North Central Wisconsin 740 North Third Street Wausau, WI 54403 Phone: (715) 842-8700; (800) 472-4408 (Toll Free) Fax: (715) 848-3511 E-mail: kbreitenfeldt@ucp-wausau.org Web: http://www.ucp-wausau.org UCP of Southeastern Wisconsin 7519 West Oklahoma Avenue… [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and Irish President Mary Robinson. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
” The court noted that in Robinson v Shell Oil Co, the Supreme Court construed “employees” as defined in Title VII to include both current and former employees because the definition lacked a “temporal qualifier. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am by Kyle Hulehan
Robinson suggests the TCJA reforms reduced the amount of tax-motivated cross-border acquisitions by U.S. firms.[7] The second way TCJA broadened the tax base was via FDII, which was designed to provide a lower tax rate of 13.125 percent on profits from exports related to IP held within the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Without any substantial analysis, however, the court gave its own ipse dixit that the existence vel non of confounding was an issue for cross-examination and the jury’s resolution.[14] Whether there was a reasonably valid association between PDE5i and melanoma was a jury question. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Robinson, Center for Health Decision Science; Craig Thornton, Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis; and W. [read post]