Search for: "In re A.D." Results 261 - 280 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, in In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 489 F. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
We're not blogging to make fools of ourselves any more than necessary. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:28 am by Scott Riddle
In re Robinson, 151 A.D. 589, 600, 136 N.Y.S. 548, 445 (1912), affirmed, 209 N.Y. 354, 103 N.E. 160 (1913) (emphasis added). 865 F.Supp. at 1525-26. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction, grant the motion, and dismiss the indictment without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges under counts two through five of the indictment to another grand jury (see generally People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
The owner of the dogs appealed because effective December 15, 2004, the law in Agriculture and Markets Law 121 and related statutes was re written expanding the definition of a dangerous dog and the sanctions that are ordered to control them. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:48 pm
The owner of the dogs appealed because effective December 15, 2004, the law in Agriculture and Markets Law 121 and related statutes was re written expanding the definition of a dangerous dog and the sanctions that are ordered to control them. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by David Strifling
Dep’t of Natural Res., 2006 WI 84, ¶ 18, 293 Wis. 2d 1, 717 N.W.2d 166. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:23 am
" Practice Pointer: Include the entire policy but be sure either the excerpt the relevant provisions in separate exhibits, identify the form/endorsement number and page of the provision, or re-paginate the entire policy and give the court a page reference. [read post]