Search for: "J L S Holdings LLC"
Results 261 - 280
of 641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
[Closing out Week Two of our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a contribution from a very special guest: Commissioner Noah J. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
Roy J. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:11 pm
Sonda J. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Hunter Patrick, JudgeRepresenting Appellant DNW (Respondent): George L. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Hubbard, for Cash Zone, LLC d/b/a Cash Biz, Respondent.Patrick E. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Kaplan and Andrew J. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:19 pm
Attorney Paul J. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Ossenfort holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and History from the University at Albany. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
("A Cobbler's Court, a Practitioner's Court: The Rehnquist Court Finds Its Groove," 1998 Tulsa L. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Georgia On Their Mind We begin in in the Northern District of Georgia, where AF Holdings LLC brought suit against a Mr. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
David Schwartz, of Innovative Science Solutions, LLC. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
(Boyce, J. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
(Boyce, J. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 11:08 am
See Lokai Holdings LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
JAR Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
Fletcher, J.) [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
The District Court rejected VIP’s contentions and enjoined VIP from manufacturing and selling its Bad Spaniels dog toy holding that when “another’s trademark is used for source identification,” the Rogers test does not apply and the test is whether the use is likely to cause confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
The District Court rejected VIP’s contentions and enjoined VIP from manufacturing and selling its Bad Spaniels dog toy holding that when “another’s trademark is used for source identification,” the Rogers test does not apply and the test is whether the use is likely to cause confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
The District Court rejected VIP’s contentions and enjoined VIP from manufacturing and selling its Bad Spaniels dog toy holding that when “another’s trademark is used for source identification,” the Rogers test does not apply and the test is whether the use is likely to cause confusion. [read post]