Search for: "Keene v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am by My name
Nevertheless, the United States Tax Court disallowed the deductions, ruled for the Commissioner, and Vetrick appealed. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the National Association of Manufacturers filed an amicus brief in support of the company’s petition. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:48 pm by highrank
  In a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Florida v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm by familoo
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am by Larry Tribe
I focus here only on the Court’s invalidation of Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Their Declaration of Sentiments condemned a wide range of “injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman”—everything from withholding the right to vote, to applying different codes of moral conduct—and demanded “immediate admission to all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of the United States. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The ACLU of Massachusetts, through private counsel, successfully argued a motion to dismiss the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute, which states in relevant part: "In any case in which a party asserts that the civil claims, counterclaims or cross claims against said party are based on said party's exercise of its right of petition under the constitution of the United States or of the commonwealth, said party may bring a special motion to dismiss." [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Adam Gillette
People with a keen grasp of legal history may recall that from the time that the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]