Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
Courts have refused to allow such cases in the past. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:50 pm
(It is not immediately clear why the criminal complaint, which Ars obtained at the Los Angeles courthouse, has four charges when online court records only show three.) [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
As Fourth Amendment nerds know, curtilage is the space immediately around the home that gets treated as an extension of the home for Fourth Amendment purposes. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
For sheer law–nerd love, it will be hard to top Vitol S.A. v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:15 am
https://t.co/MlrRws0Vhn 2018-05-16 Section 230 protected Google in lawsuit over blog post https://t.co/KKFeHminRo 2018-05-16 Protecting Indigenous Knowledge in Canada https://t.co/4xoohT7XPO 2018-05-16 “Nerd’s Version of a Fist Fight” Doesn’t Support Injunction Against Blogger–Santilli v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:37 am
” The court says: These posts inspired viewers’ comments, which read like a nerd’s version of a fist fight…Mostly the comments are a pseudo slug-fest between Van Erp in one corner and Frank Stone [allegedly a pseudonym adopted by Santilli] in the other Santilli claims the blog posts thwarted his efforts to solicit investors in his telescope invention. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
I'll conclude with two minor points about rhetoric and terminology for the handful of serious Fourth Amendment nerds who make it to the end. (1) The Holding. [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:40 pm
" These posts inspired viewers' comments, which read like a nerd's version of a fist fight. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:12 pm
Training them now immediately reduces your risk of liability — both in court and as a result of a DOL investigation. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:39 pm
Dad argued that a particular rule of civil procedure (V.R.C.P. 15(b) for you nerds out there), permitted the court to amend his initial motion. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
The Court concluded that because the ADEA was enacted to prohibit job practices that make it more difficult for older workers to find jobs the district court was wrong to grant the employer’s motion (a 12(b)(6) motion for the procedural nerds out there) dismissing the plaintiff’s disparate impact claim. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:30 am
It's a given that with such appellate bona fides there's a serious nerd-component at play, and he admits in his profile that he enjoys Starcraft II.Today's MetNews has Bendix, Moor Confirmed as Justices of Second District Court of Appeal; Greenwood Approved as Sixth District Presiding Justice. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:18 am
Court enjoins permitting requirement for augmented reality game. * The Atlantic: The Digital Ruins of a Forgotten Future: “Second Life was supposed to be the future of the internet, but then Facebook came along. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
., the government) subject to court orders. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:13 am
”Since trial judges don’t moonlight as law tutors for pro se corporate litigants, the court instructed Extreme’s principal to hire counsel by March 6, 2015, which was extended to April 13 (here’s a good case on the corporate representation rule for anyone who wants to put their law nerd cap on). [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 10:22 am
“Pursing a law career later in life, Supreme Court candidate Screnock proudly wears ‘legal nerd’ label”: Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this report. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 8:51 am
It’s a fascinating process (at least to a legal nerd like me) to watch a court change its rules. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
And yes, often no courts with arms long enough to reach into the depth of the cryptocurrency world. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 12:07 pm
Or how a federal district court judge can block a presidential executive order? [read post]
