Search for: "P D
v.
Review Board"
Results 261 - 280
of 823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2020, 3:55 am
In an op-ed at The Daily Journal, Glenn Roper finds it troubling that, in Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
Further, if a non-probationary officer (i.e., a `P–II’ or `P–III’ officer) needed help running a computer search, the station's `record clerk’ would ordinarily provide assistance; training was not Dove's primary assignment. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution … [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Supp. 522 (D RI 1985); Legree v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
The first is in Monasky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Nir Kossovsky, D. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
Dennis D. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Samuel Estreicher is the Dwight D. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
9 May 2007, 3:12 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Hicks and Pronghorn Publishing, Board of Trustees of the Scenic Preserve Trust v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:24 am
Summary of Order August 30, 2012Order Suspending Attorney from the Practice of LawCase Name: Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar, v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:14 am
Brady and Ryan P. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The fourth speaker was Andrew P. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
Hubbard, Deputy Attorney General; Karl D. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Michael P. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Reciting Articles 65(2) and 76 CTMR, it observed that the Court’s scrutiny is limited to the facts, evidence and arguments brought by the parties during the previous proceedings, and to the matters of law thereby examined (Case T-57/03, Société provençale d’achat et de gestion (SPAG) SAS v OHIM). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
-Sam D. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:47 am
P. 4 as its starting point. [read post]
