Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 261 - 280
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
” Q is for the Queen v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:59 am
., X cases of a particular beer, Y bottles of a particular champagne, and Z sandwiches from a particular shop). [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
X–Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64 (1994). [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm
See Keystone Bridge Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
One amicus brief often praised by Plaintiffs’ counsel was submitted by Professor Kenneth Rothman and colleagues.2 This amicus brief is still cited by parties who find support in the brief for their excuses for not having consistent, valid, strong, and statistically significance evidence to support their claims of causation. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
That requirement does not extend to political parties. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
Roberts Jr. was particularly dismissive of what he called — rather oddly — “sociological gobbledygook” in the challengers’ arguments: [If] you’re the intelligent man on the street and the Court issues a decision, and let’s say the Democrats win, and that person will say: Well, why did the Democrats win And the answer is going to be because EG was greater than 7 percent, where EG is the sigma of party X wasted votes minus the sigma of… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Y is for Yes - Many want the negotiators to say "yes" in order to get the benefits they desire assoon aspossible. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:10 am
If the contract in fact contains your obligation to do x y or z, you may be out of luck without more. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:56 am
Use of substance X in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of condition Y". 2. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:46 am
A typical modification clause says something like this: Upon the affirmative vote of holders of not less than X% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the issuer may modify, amend, or supplement the terms of the Bonds; provided, however, that no such action may, without the consent of holders X+Y% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, reduce the principal amount of any Bond. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
Maryland)The prosecution responded to Friddle’s overbreadth argument by asserting thatthe warrant was not overbroad, because it related solely to `electronic evidence that the defendant already made Officer McClendon aware of that existed’—which, in turn, `leads an officer to know that there might be additional evidence related to this crime on X, Y, and Z piece of evidence or on other electronic means. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
Judges are specifically cautioned against delivering a decision before they have fully considered their reasons – precisely because a judge can be clear in her mind that she is going to do X, but the process of analysing and setting out the evidence and applying the law can reveal that X was in fact the wrong answer – and thus the decision will be Y. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
Mongeon Bay Properties LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of X v Y and Z [2017] NSWSC 1214 Pembroke J extended orders against foreign defendants to restrain the publication of confidential information on various platforms and websites. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
The case at issue is last year’s C P Aquaculture (India) Pvt Ltd v Aqua Star Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 2134. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
" It's noteworthy that the record analyzed by the court doesn't seem to include any examles of direct, unequivocal threats, such "If you don't take down X, I will inflict punishment Y. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Credit Union v. [read post]
