Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL" Results 261 - 280 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 9:21 am by Daniel Schwartz
It’s hard to get into a lot of detail in a simple blog post but to understand the significance potentially of this rule and the elimination of it, recall the 2017 Connecticut Supreme Court case of Amaral Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar discusses the court’s approach to precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Rick Pildes
  The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Because many Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not been in the race, and the pickup of these Nader voters would have given Gore more states. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. [read post]