Search for: "STATE v. BAXTER" Results 261 - 280 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Bexis
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 235 F.3d 1307, 1317 (11th Cir. 2000) (“reaffirming” prior decision concerning warnings and punitive damages); Richards v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
 “Fraud on the market” isn’t a state-law claim. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  This order stated that the cause would be resubmitted on January 13, 2012. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Patrick Vance have posted The Scope and Implications of Stern v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1997) (quoting In re Baxter, 656 F.2d 679, 686 (CCPA 1981)). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:54 am
Mr Justice Burton concluded his judgment by stating that the choice by an insured of his own lawyer did not "of itself constitute the taking of an unreasonable step".___________________________________ 1(1) Christine Brown-Quinn (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) Motorplus Ltd: Webster Dixton LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) ACM ULR Ltd: (1) Janine Baxter (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
In both decisions, Judge Posner was on a panel with Chief Judge Easterbrook, so the intellectual lineup behind the opinions was as strong and fearsome as Billy Williams batting after Banks.Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:07 pm by Jordan D. Maglich
 As the Supreme Court stated in Baxter v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am by webmaster
  The hearing also covered rest break issues implicated by Brinkley v. [read post]