Search for: "Wells v. Smith*" Results 261 - 280 of 5,782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
  It's an exceptionally rare case when I'd say that the failure to give a surrebuttal require a new trial.But when, as here, the AUSA admits he sandbagged the defendant, and makes a new argument in closing that way well not be supported by the evidence and to which the defendant has not chance at all to respond; well, that may well be the exception that proves the rule.P.S. - I still hate the font and format the Ninth Circuit now uses in the slip opinions. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:14 am
  What counts as one, as well as what the consequences are of not raising it.Think it matters? [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
It seems a well established legal principle that it is not for the court to mark its disapproval by depriving the claimant of that to which they are entitled. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the most closely-watched patent case of the term, United States / Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:38 pm by Paul Mark Sandler
(Part II of four parts) We return to the hypothetical case of Smith v. [read post]