Search for: "MATTER OF C M R"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 2,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
R. 11’s requirement that Dangler be informed of the punitive consequences of his plea. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
ALI § 72, comment c. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:38 am
Living Wills and Advance Directive NJ called Living Wills w state infoCompiled By KENNETH A. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
And I’m not saying that’s what it is here, but you can consider that. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
This is a long post that will cover the issues in unusual depth, so here’s a roadmap to let you know where I’m going. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
§ 5321(a)(5)(C)(i) (2004), supersedes 31 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
C. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm
But no interest, no matter how compelling it may be, can justify the elimination of constitutional rights. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am
The USGCD eventually notified the individuals that the USGBC had looked into the matter and found everything to be fine. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:38 am
Howard C. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:43 pm
Turns out, I’m in pretty good company in omitting this theory. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
For this article, I’m going to focus primarily on “webcasting”, or internet radio services like Pandora. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
This makes sense, since the argument also covered shaming punishments, which are designed to be administered by ordinary people like you and me, with no pecuniary expectations in the matter. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 10:06 pm
I’m Marlene Gebauer. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Good faith -- Chapter 13 debtors failed to carry their burden to establish confirmation of good faith plan where debtors purchased and financed vehicles shortly before their bankruptcy filings in contemplation of those filings, and then proposed chapter 13 plan which would repay the 910-day car claim at less than contractual interest rates such that plans were not proposed in good faith -- Confirmation denied without prejudice to… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
