Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 7,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:23 pm
U. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
A member country’s patent laws may properly extend the term of a drug patent to offset a lengthy regulatory review period, or may properly allow generic drug makers to begin seeking their own regulatory approval during the patent term. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 1:04 pm
Nevertheless, the case may shed light on Gorsuch’s style of statutory interpretation. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
“[U]nder the Indian Commerce Clause. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
Lisi’s employment agreement was executed on May 28, and took effect on June 25, 2012. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:31 pm
(See Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:28 am
Last month, the Sixth Circuit revived a lawsuit brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) alleging that a retailer’s commission policy was unlawful in Stein v. hhgregg, Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
This was the situation in T.L.H. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
This was the situation in T.L.H. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:33 am
In May, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Supreme Court of Kentucky’s decision in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
Slip Op 51759[U], *30). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
Slip Op 51759[U], *30). [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:21 pm
For more information on the Supreme Court’s precedent in Lawson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:46 pm
It requires the employee to refrain from accepting employment that may require him to use, disclose, or rely on the employer's confidential information. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
In a recent High Court case (Cox v Spencer [2017] EWHC 2552 (QB)), the employer was granted an order that meant it could image the employee’s computer to see if it contained any of their confidential information. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:25 pm
Small Justice v. [read post]
