Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2781 - 2800 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We therefore reverse the grant of summaryjudgment for Sunovion.Of public useAn applicant may not receive a patent for an inventionthat was “in public use . . . in this country, more thanone year prior to the date of the application for patent inthe United States. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: You are on record as being a staunch defender of the holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  This system reflects the complicated religious/secular marriage traditions in the United States. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:38 am by Gene Quinn
In what can only fairly be characterized as a patent tragedy, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit now has no official position on the patentability of system claims that objectively recite volumes of tangible structures that clearly satisfy the machine-or-transformation test. [read post]
11 May 2013, 11:36 am by Schachtman
  A political (or a religious) worldview places core commitments above empirical data, as was so clearly revealed in the case of The Vatican v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:39 am by Ken White
Sure, Nazaire is trying to make a point that the decisions of a United States District Judge in one state do not dictate the decisions of a United States District Judge in another state. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am by Benjamin Wittes
Only in 2008, Koh made the following remarks in testimony before a Senate subcommittee: the Bush Administration has consistently asserted a constitutional theory of unfettered executive power, based on extraordinarily broad interpretations of Article II’s “Commander-in-Chief” Clause and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Car market v. moral relations—treating people as other humans rather than anthropological units. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:53 pm by Daniel Richardson
  The dissent notes that no court in the United States has credited a disabled parent for these benefits when it comes to allocating child support obligations. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Kevin Russell
Arguing for the United States as an amicus supporting Nassar, Melissa Arbus Sherry was immediately confronted by Justice Kennedy’s practical concerns. [read post]