Search for: "DOE 5" Results 2801 - 2820 of 86,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2008, 4:54 am
Additionally, if the facts and circumstances warrant, we could bring an action under both Regulation G and Rule 10b-5.Note: Bold print and italics added by me.One specific issue cited by the SEC that could give rise to a Rule 10b-5 violation i [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 3:00 pm
You must not be convicted of one of the 21 crimes listed above. 5. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:25 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Finally, despite this potential breach, the Protocol still will permit a representative to service his or her old clients - as long as he or she does not use "excess information. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
It does not address hundreds of confirmed emails of Hunter Biden cashing in on an array of foreign contacts. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 am by Rania Combs
Portability does not apply to the $5 million exemption from the generation skipping transfer tax. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Heidi Henson
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court has held the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional (National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, June 28, 2012, Roberts, J). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Eric B. Meyer
While it’s possible that a task performed 5% of the time may be essential, it seems to me to be an uphill battle to fight accommodating an employee by allowing him to do something that he already does 95% of the time anyway — especially when the alternative is another job with a pay cut. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:30 am by Goldberg Jones
Not only does your filing status change, but you also have to deal with other issues. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 8:38 am by Anonymous
refid=347&trackid=347"><img src="http://pillsvx.net/pillss/bane/5.jpg"></a> Your marriage is close to collapse? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Novelty (Article 100(a) and Article 54(1) EPC)Document (1) does not provide a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the feature of intramuscular injection and is thus not novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.(...)5. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm by Mark J. Caruso, attorney
A Supreme Court decision Monday allowing smokers to sue tobacco companies for fraud in marketing "light" cigarettes is the latest development against cigarettes touted as low in tar and nicotine.In a win for consumers over business interests, the justices decided 5-4 that federal regulation of cigarette labels does not shield manufacturers from state claims of deceptive advertising. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:03 pm by Kurt R. Karst
”  However, the White Paper does not acknowledge the role that DEA plays. [read post]