Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 18,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2008, 7:15 pm
According to court opinion (available here), after the actor’s initial indictment on the felony charges, but before his arraignment, [T]he District Attorney’s office provided information regarding the matter to the New York Daily News and the New York Post. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
Cal.) joined by Ninth Circuit Judges Gabriel P. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
See also Matter of Warburg, 38 Misc.2d 997, 237 N.Y.S.2d 557; Matter of Hammer, 33 Misc.2d 67 [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
The question was whether isolated DNA molecules as compositions of matter, expressly authorised suitable patent eligible matter in section 101, were patent ineligible products of nature, as prohibited by case law. 'Patent eligibility, not patentability' as Circuit Judge Lourie put it at p. 37 of his opinion. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
In the Lipitor MDL for diabetes litigation, Judge Gergel generally used sharp analyses to cut through the rancid fat of litigation claims, to get to the heart of the matter. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
In the Lipitor MDL for diabetes litigation, Judge Gergel generally used sharp analyses to cut through the rancid fat of litigation claims, to get to the heart of the matter. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 6:08 am
” From Nicholas Kristof’s op-ed column, p A27 “Some mix of fear, love, hopelessness and shattered self-esteem keep her from trying to run away. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:59 am
Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:52 pm
3d 490, 723 P.2d 573, 574 (1986). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:24 am
Biskupic writes (on p. 239) that "at the same time" that "Roberts was crafting an argument that would support the individual mandate based on Congress's taxing authority," "he began incorporating arguments that would invalidate the Medicaid expansion. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:34 pm
It instead "remand[s] the matter for PERB to determine whether to declare void the Board’s resolution placing on the ballot the Measure P provisions subject to effects bargaining, or to impose any other remedy such as ordering the County to cease and desist from implementing the Measure P amendments on Association-represented employees until the County fulfills its effects bargaining obligation" -- and also notes that the election might be… [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:20 am
[…] Google credits Microsoft’s missteps in the 1990s with helping it see the wisdom of setting up shop in Washington in a big way and using the many tools available in the capital, such as lobbying and lawyering, to get its way on major policy matters. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:00 am
Reversing a lower court's ruling that Pringles did not qualify as "potato chips" for purposes of taxation, Britain's Court of Appeals has held that they are, basically, close enough.This matters because if Pringles are considered "potato chips" - or "potato crisps," as they are mistakenly called in Britain - then Proctor & Gamble UK has to pay a value-added tax, but otherwise Pringles are exempt. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:21 am
In that matter, there are no atheists. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:16 pm
The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:39 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 137 S. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm
It’s too early to say for sure. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 5:45 pm
Given that Nieto's paper is about "presidentialism," and that Obregon was president between 1920 and 1924, one suspects Obregon's Yaqui matter, with Obregon's military period against the Yaqui's being between October 1926 to April 1927 is not relevant to Nieto's thesis; the answer is "no, not right. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
(P. 8.) [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
P. 50(a)) which provides that the rule “does not authorize a trial judge, after the defense has presented its case (in whole or in part), to revisit, and grant, a defense motion for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of the plaintiff’s case without considering, in addition to the evidence presented in the plaintiff’s case, the evidence presented by the defense. [read post]
