Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 2821 - 2840 of 5,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  It is our view that it would be helpful to make a conforming amendment to § 1026.20(b). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 10:36 pm by Old Fox
edub says:Arriving In HeavenAll arrivals in heaven have to go through a bureaucratic examination to determine whether admission will be granted. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:41 pm
§ 1300.71(a)(3)(B) (listing six subjective fee reasonableness factors to calculate reimbursement for services provided to HMO enrollees) and 28 C.C.R. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:41 pm
§ 1300.71(a)(3)(B) (listing six subjective fee reasonableness factors to calculate reimbursement for services provided to HMO enrollees) and 28 C.C.R. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:41 pm
§ 1300.71(a)(3)(B) (listing six subjective fee reasonableness factors to calculate reimbursement for services provided to HMO enrollees) and 28 C.C.R. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:41 pm
§ 1300.71(a)(3)(B) (listing six subjective fee reasonableness factors to calculate reimbursement for services provided to HMO enrollees) and 28 C.C.R. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 5:59 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
The following are a list of documents that are required to be exchanged: (1) A financial affidavit in substantial conformity with Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.902(b) if the party’s gross annual income is less than $50,000, or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.902(c) if the party’s gross annual income is equal to or more than $50,000, which requirement cannot be waived by the parties. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Weiner writes: [C]ontrary to Professor Adler’s claim, when Congress referred in the ACA to insurance exchanges (as opposed to, say, exchanges of information or cash), it did not use the term “exchange” to mean one thing in one place and something else in another. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:04 am by Bill Marler
Rodney’s medical history is significant for HIV (diagnosed in October 1996), Hepatitis C (diagnosed in 1998), and past substance abuse. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:58 am by Gregorgy Dell
The Court’s Rationale The Policy in question states that any benefits under the following sources are considered “other income benefits”: (a) workers’ compensation law; or (b) occupational disease law; or (c) unemployment compensation law; or (d) compulsory benefits act or law; or (e) an automobile no-fault insurance plan; or (f) any other act or law of like intent… The Courts noted that VA benefits are “nondiscretionary, statutorily… [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:31 am by Shane Smith
Safeco Insurance Company of America,1 the court addressed the meaning of the term “replacement cost”, which, under the particular policy in that case, shall not exceed: the smallest of the following amounts: (a) the limit of liability under the policy applying to Coverage A or B; (b) the replacement cost of that part of the damaged building for equivalent construction and use on the same premises as determined shortly following the loss; (c) the… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 10:45 am by Employment Services
The IRS is currently inviting comments on the draft forms.The forms aim to fulfill the reporting requirements as follows:6055 Compliance 6056 Compliance Health insurance issuers, sponsors of self-funded health plans, and other entities that provide minimum essential coverage (MEC) must file: Applicable large employers that employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) on business days during the preceding year must file: Form… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:00 am by Caitlin Byars
  In reaching this decision, the Board explained the limited options of a administrative law judge when reviewing a Section 8(i) Settlement Agreement: 1) issue a deficiency notice if the application is incomplete, 20 C.F.R. 702.242, 702.243(b); 2) approve the settlement if it is adequate and not procured by duress, 33 U.S.C. 908(i)(1); 20 C.F.R. 702.243(b); 3) disapprove the settlement if it is inadequate or was procured under duress, 33 U.S.C. 908(i)(1)-(2); 20 C.F.R.… [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
CASL (Canada's Spam Law) Must Be Repealed http://t.co/Apznw91pE5 -> Unforeseen CASL fallout: ‘additional insured status’ requests http://t.co/RWyJWoZf89 -> 3 Ways Canada’s Anti-Spam Law Impacts VAR Sales Teams http://t.co/Z98J58MNNo -> Appeal dismissed: dispute over ownership, alleged copyright infringement of software programs http://t.co/lBrZIGcsJN -> Jimmy Wales is wrong: we do have a personal right to be forgotten http://t.co/9t7Kjf7NJM -> More than… [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  Moreover, “[i]f full CEQA review were required before [direct] … adopt[ion], the abbreviated report provided for by sections 9212 and 9214(c) would be superfluous. [read post]