Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm by Josh Blackman
And the Chief posed a similar question for the United States as amicus curiae: You're confident that the mootness question is easy. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm by Amanda Frost
  (Starting with Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, the thermal imaging case, we had this line-up:SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SOUTER, THOMAS, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm by admin
A few months ago, I wrote about the arguments being heard by the United States Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Tejinder Singh
United States, we got as close to unanimity as the week allowed. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:45 am
However, when Justice Scalia asked both the respondent and the United States as amicus to the respondents whether Marrama's case was moot, both took the position that mootness was not a problem here. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm by Peter Margulies
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:45 am by Orin Kerr
United States, Justice Scalia argued that this entire approach was illegitimate. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:56 pm by Erin Miller
United States, and McDonald v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States (1957), which was modified in some measure by Miller v. [read post]