Search for: "Jones v. State"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 6,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm
In that case, Shapero v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:25 am
Back in August, the Third Circuit handed down an unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
JONES V TSIGE The Facts The plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the petitioners in Kirby v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
Baer (Brooklyn Law School) has posted Secrecy, Intimacy and Workable Rules: Justice Sotomayor Stakes Out the Middle in United States V. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:44 pm
The paper was given at the NSW State Legal Conference on Thursday 28 August 2014. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 11:23 am
Jones and Riley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
Jones, 2014 WL 177410 (N.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:25 am
On September 18, a divided panel of the Fifth Circuit (Reavley, Jones (dissenting), Graves) issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Ct. 945 (2012), and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
Apr. 23, 2012); Jones v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
But he expressed little remorse for his actions and stated he enjoyed the “thrill of the hunt”: see para 9. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Latsis thirty-percent rule—that, ordinarily, a qualifying “seaman” under the Jones Act must spend thirty percent or more of his time in service of a vessel in navigation—a court may consider the time a [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Jones Day blog post on In re Lett. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Jones Day blog post on In re Lett. [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Warrantless GPS Tracking Device, Revisited. State of Ohio v. Sudinia Johnson.
16 Sep 2014, 8:32 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:38 am
The court noted, however, that the employer agreed that the employee was entitled to a commission and that it expected the employer to “follow through on its representations” (Karlen v Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc, September 9, 2014, Kelly, J). [read post]
