Search for: "A B C Insurance"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 5,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2014, 6:02 am
Some insurance companies will refuse to even insure a person with an impaired driving criminal record, forcing that person to go with high risk brokers and paying the corresponding high rates. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Kelly 147,100 150,000 0 102 297,202 Jon C. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:58 pm
Importantly, the certificate of insurance must: (a) describe the type of work the contractor and subcontractor performs, (b) the name and telephone number of the contractor’s insurance broker or agent, and (c) name the City of Philadelphia as an additional insured[2]. [read post]
Amended Class Definition That Excludes Putative Class Member Does Not Preclude American Pipe Tolling
24 Jun 2014, 2:40 pm
In 2013, Plaintiff Machesney filed a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class action against Ramsgate Insurance Company in the Eastern District of Michigan after receiving three junk faxes between 2006 and 2007. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Other compensation included the payment of travel accident insurance premiums. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
As with other impairment evaluations, the insurer may also contest the percentage of impairment,. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am
Because the District filed an NOD, it contended the 30-day limitations period of either Public Resources Code § 21167(b) or (e) applied to bar the action. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Sharif, 13-935, which the Court had been holding for Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
Arbitration agreement’s limitations on choice of arbitrator AMERICO LIFE, INC., AMERICO FINANCIAL LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE OHIO STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL FARMERS UNION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
And what about which comp board takes jurisdiction over an accident which occurs in state A, involving an employer from state B, whose home office is in state C? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
Rule 1.15(b) and (c) because he failed to keep trust property separate from his own, and instead used client funds for personal expenses. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:57 am
BOARD OF EDUCATION B 52 3RD AVE BRENTWOOD NY 11717 ASSOCIATES CAPITAL BANK BOARD OF EDUCATION C 333 7TH AVE NEW YORK NY 10001 CDW LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF NEW 65 COURT ST RM 712 ACCTS PAYABLE BROOKLYN NY 11201 CDW LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF NEW YORK 65 COURT ST OFFICE OF PAYMENTS AND SUPPO RT BROOKLYN NY 11201 CDW LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF NEW YORK 333 SEVENTH AVE NEW YORK NY 11201 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BOARD… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:13 am
§3604(b) (It is unlawful to discriminate against any person in the sale or rental of a dwelling because of familial status.) 42 U.S.C. 3613(c) (In a housing discrimination case, the plaintiff is limited to (1) actual and punitive damages if the court finds that a discriminatory housing practice has occurred; (2) injunctive relief enjoining the defendant from continuing to engage in discriminatory practices; and (3) attorney fees to the prevailing party.) [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
The same deliberate intent is required in subsection (C) as in (A) and (B). [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
"The "household" exclusionThe exclusions section of the policy provides that "Coverage C (Personal Liability) does not apply to bodily injury to you or an insured within the meaning of part a, or part b, of insured as defined. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
On the “duty” point, it argued: (a) there was a duty to insurance in line with the CML guidelines; (b) those included “explosions” as a usual risk; (c) that was, on its ordinary meaning, apt to include explosions caused by terrorism (with support derived from Commonwealth Smelting v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
However, in an unanimous 9-0 decision in Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
Subsection (C) of the employer intentional tort statute, with its rebuttable presumption, establishes a different way of proving an employer intentional tort than (A) or (B). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
C. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
In light of the evidence that the plaintiff's income exceeded $500,000 and the gross disparity between the plaintiff's income and the defendant's income, the Supreme Court properly awarded additional support in the form of a directive to the plaintiff to pay the mortgage and taxes on the marital residence (Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5-a][c][2][a][ii] ), as well as the defendant's car insurance (see e.g. [read post]
