Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 2881 - 2900 of 9,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am by Dan Bressler
At least that’s what a Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey decided last week in Harish v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:25 pm by Marc DeGirolami
Setting aside the regrettable state of constitutional free exercise doctrine right now, negotiating the claims of religious liberty against those that oppose them is always a question of getting a little here and losing a little there; the gains are lovely, but they do not compensate for the losses. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
Even where a defendant's whereabouts are known, there are times when it is logistically difficult, if not impossible, for a process server to gain the close proximity necessary for personal delivery.Baidoo v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:05 am by Rich McHugh
Citing the 1996 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Verity Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by David Post
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]
Carr, the landmark 1962 case in which voters from Tennessee complained that the state’s malapportioned state legislative districts violated the equal protection clause, the Constitution has served as an effective limit on the propensity of politicians to manipulate election districts for their own political gain. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:46 am
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:47 pm by Michael DeRose
This bill comes at a time when public sector unions across New Jersey and the rest of the Country await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:47 pm by Michael DeRose
This bill comes at a time when public sector unions across New Jersey and the rest of the Country await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Daniel Hemel
That — more or less — is the central question in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am by itars sis
In addition, the State is responsible for the protection of cultural and natural heritage and the harmonious development of culture in Slovenia.[17] This Article is linked to Article 73 of the Constitution, which states that everyone has a duty to protect cultural monuments. [read post]