Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Allen Arnett v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Phoenix Bridge Company, 98 N.H. 261 (1953), was a suit by a concrete subcontractor on a State bridge project who agreed to “be bound by and conform to the general specifications in all respects wherein they apply to the work embraced in this agreement” and agreed to accept payment “for the quantity of material approved by the State Highway Commission. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
One part of my Foreword is an investigation into the role of race in two of the Court’s biggest cases last Term—New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
In June Medical v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
On September 26, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a panel decision in Sunovion Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
This dates back to the antebellum Supreme Court decision in Prigg v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
In Sherbert v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Appellate Division holds Civil Service Law Article 14 trumps Second Class Cities Law Article 9 with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
Regardless, it is now clear that many states are interested in just what consideration at-will employees must receive to be bound by post-termination non-competes. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:39 am
Stephens, the state’s Supreme Court held that corporate officers and directors are bound by the same standard of fiduciary duties. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm
In MR v North Tyneside Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2015] UKUT 34 (AAC) [Our report], we saw the Upper Tribunal accept the DWP argument on the position of ‘shared care’ families for bedroom tax purposes. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Supreme Court’s June 15, 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 am
In the recent judgment, AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2011] EWCA Civ 647, the Court of Appeal held that an anti-suit injunction can be granted to restrain foreign proceedings brought in breach of an English arbitration agreement, even in the absence of an actual, proposed or intended arbitration.The dispute arose out of a concession agreement to produce hydroelectric energy between the state of Kazakhstan government (D) and a US… [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 11:36 am
In Harrison v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:21 am
--Court: Court of Appeals of North CarolinaOpinion Date: 4/7/09Cite: Hejl v. [read post]
