Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 9,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm
Express Homebuyers USA, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am
True, Sir Philip can afford expensive lawyers, but on any view this was no longer a David v Goliath case. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
” Also at Law360, Ryan Davis reports that another of the newly granted cases, Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:30 am
Facts: This case (Carter v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am
The appellants' arguments can be summarized as follows:[...]V. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
” At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth cautions that, when the court decides Jam v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
The prohibition on unlawful insider trading levels the playing field and protects the integrity of financial markets. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:03 pm
Some immediate uses of this spring to mind, in particular, where the landlord has failed to take action or permitted short let/airbnb use of a leasehold flat, in breach of a restricted user clause, and ignored the other leaseholders’ protests. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:43 pm
As my colleague discussed at the time, in Bridgeman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 2:50 pm
Risher.For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-v-san-bernardino-country-sheriffFor more on cell-site simulators:https://www.eff.org/pages/cell-site-simulatorsimsi-catchers Tags: Street Level SurveillanceCell-site simulatorsStingraysContact: DaveMaassSenior Investigative Researcherdm@eff.org [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
In contrast, the Court of Appeal held that a hard-edged non-discrimination rule has the potential to harm the technological development of standards if it has the effect of compelling the SEP owner to accept a level of compensation for the use of its invention which does not reflect the value of the licensed technology. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
The Court concluded that it could not grant summary judgment with respect to the remedy for non-compliance because there was no evidence establishing as a matter of law that WCAG 2.0 at any success level is what the ADA requires. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:57 pm
Among the several important legal principles recited by the court in this useful opinion, are the following principles highlighted by bullet points: The court reiterates the familiar prerequisites that must be satisfied in order for a preliminary injunction to be granted. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:30 am
” In sum, the ability to regulate conduct or activities that constitute a nuisance is well within the scope of authority granted to an association. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Question: You write of Justice John Marshall Harlan’s famous solo dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:06 pm
.: SC18-1573, League of Women Voters, et. al. v. [read post]
