Search for: "Jones v. United States" Results 2941 - 2960 of 3,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
(He might have had to answer some more difficult questions, though, since he was even then seeking to regularize his immigration status after entering the United States unlawfully.) [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:51 pm by Stephan Futeral
Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990), the United States Supreme Court gave a prime example of how an opinion may constitute defamation: If a speaker says, “In my opinion John Jones is a liar,” he implies a knowledge of facts which lead to the conclusion that Jones told an untruth. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am by John Elwood
Citing its recent opinions in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary of that strand: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 706(2)(E).Section 102(b) provides that a person shall be entitledto a patent unless the invention was described in a printedpublication more than one year prior to the date ofapplication for patent in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
With the current agreement between Israel and the United States is set to expire in 2017, Netanyahu sought an increase in annual aid from $3 billion to $4.5 billion. [read post]