Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
The United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 2008, that is on point. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case: United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm
A bitterly divided United States Supreme Court last week added even more height to the barriers facing plaintiffs who seek to certify their claims as class actions. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
United States, 133 F.3d 897, 902 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 2:06 am
See Gregg v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employee's speech made in a official capacity was not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am
Section 1: Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:07 am
United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 10:16 pm
Mark R. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
After Beasley’s failed petitions to cancel Howard’s USPT, Beasley filed a suit in the United States District Court of New Jersey under the Lanham Act, alleging an infringement claim against Howard. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:22 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released its final provisions pertaining to reduction of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) under certain circumstances in view of the Federal Circuit decision in Supernus (Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
Fouad Kallamni v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
